Stablecoins represent privately issued digital currencies pegged to fiat currencies, with dollar-denominated stablecoins operating similarly to the concept of "narrow banking." Issuers maintain zero-interest liabilities (stablecoins) while earning interest on reserve assets that back these stablecoins. The elastic supply of stablecoins has expanded significantly in recent years, driven by widening interest rate differentials as dollar rates rose sharply. However, since stablecoins pay no interest, their circulating supply remains primarily demand-driven. Users accept zero yields because stablecoins provide transactional convenience benefits—facilitating crypto-asset trading and offering lower-cost cross-border payments compared to traditional banking systems. Regulatory arbitrage plays a key role here, alongside their utility as hedges against volatile currencies. While other currency-pegged stablecoins could theoretically serve these purposes, the dollar’s incumbency as the global reserve currency grants it network effects and scale advantages, marginalizing competitors. This explains why the European Central Bank advocates digital euros (CBDCs) over euro-backed stablecoins to counter dollar stablecoins. For China, promoting third-party payment tools (like WeChat Pay and Alipay) in cross-border transactions aligns with its manufacturing and trade strengths—these platform-based "yuan stablecoins" emphasize economic attributes over financial speculation, leveraging China’s industrial scale. Meanwhile, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) offer exogenous tools to mitigate the dollar’s market dominance, such as multilateral CBDC bridges for cross-border infrastructure. Recent U.S. policy shifts under the Trump administration—endorsing dollar-pegged stablecoins while opposing Fed-issued CBDCs—highlight strategic moves to reinforce dollar hegemony through digital assets. Globally, responses like Hong Kong’s Stablecoin Ordinance Draft and EU digital euro proposals reflect attempts to balance innovation with monetary sovereignty.
What Are Stablecoins (and What Are They Not)?
Stablecoins are a class of cryptocurrency designed to maintain stable value by pegging to specific assets, predominantly the U.S. dollar (e.g., USDT, USDC). Key distinctions:
- Technological Efficiency ≠ Decentralization:
Though blockchain-based, most stablecoins exhibit centralized control over issuance/reserves (e.g., Tether’s authority over USDT). Smart contracts enable decentralized finance (DeFi) applications but don’t eliminate issuer centralization. - Private Money, Not Sovereign Currency:
Under U.S. regulatory proposals (e.g., _GENIUS Act_), stablecoins are interest-free liabilities backed 1:1 by liquid assets, functioning as private-sector extensions of the dollar. - "Narrow Banking" Parallels:
Stablecoin models resemble narrow banking—holding low-risk assets (cash, Treasuries) to avoid traditional bank risks like maturity mismatches. This separates money creation from credit allocation, a theoretical ideal in proposals like the Chicago Plan. - China’s De Facto Stablecoins:
Platforms like WeChat Pay and Alipay operate similarly to regulated stablecoins, with user balances fully backed by central bank reserves (PBOC custodial deposits). Their strict oversight contrasts with offshore stablecoins’ speculative freedoms.
How Stablecoins Reduce Costs (and Where They Fall Short)
Stablecoins’ primary value proposition lies in cross-border payments, where they undercut traditional banking fees by:
- Leveraging Competitive Digital Markets:
Public blockchain competition reduces transaction fees (e.g., gas fee optimization), unlike monopolistic systems like SWIFT or card networks (Visa/Mastercard). - Circumventing Regulatory Costs:
Anonymity bypasses AML/KYC overheads, though this invites scrutiny for sanction evasion or illicit flows (e.g., Russia’s USDT-based oil trades).
Limitations:
For multi-currency transactions, stablecoins don’t eliminate forex costs—local banking regulations still apply. The dollar’s dominance as a vehicle currency gives USDT asymmetric advantages over potential euro or yuan rivals.
Demand Drivers: Why Hold Zero-Yield Stablecoins?
Four hypotheses explain rising stablecoin adoption despite higher dollar rates:
- Currency Substitution:
In hyperinflation economies (e.g., Turkey), stablecoins hedge local currency risks—but interest-bearing dollar deposits often dominate. - Trade Finance:
SMEs use stablecoins for cheaper B2B cross-border settlements, though PayPal rivals this niche. - Crypto Trading:
Bitcoin’s volatility boosts demand for stablecoin trading pairs and collateral in DeFi. - Gray Market Activity:
Anonymous transactions evade capital controls or sanctions (e.g., Iran, Venezuela), linking to #3 via offshore crypto exchanges.
Conclusion: #3 and #4 dominate, with DeFi’s growth and regulatory arbitrage reinforcing demand.
Risks and Policy Implications
- Fragility of Private Money:
Even 100%-backed stablecoins face runs (e.g., USDC’s 2023 depeg during SVB’s collapse). Tether’s risky reserves (~20% in BTC/loans) exemplify profit motives trumping stability. Strategic Responses:
- U.S.: Harness stablecoins to extend dollar dominance.
- EU: Develop CBDCs (digital euros) to bypass private stablecoin risks.
- China: Scale WeChat Pay/Alipay globally, using CBDCs for infrastructure (e.g., mBridge).
- Hong Kong’s Role:
Pilot regulated yuan stablecoins to test innovation while containing systemic risks.
👉 Explore the future of digital currencies
👉 How CBDCs could reshape global finance
FAQ
Q: How do stablecoins differ from CBDCs?
A: Stablecoins are privately issued and often less regulated, while CBDCs are sovereign digital money with central bank backing (e.g., digital yuan).
Q: Can stablecoins replace traditional banks?
A: Unlikely—they lack credit intermediation functions and deposit insurance, critical for mainstream finance.
Q: Why is the U.S. favoring stablecoins over a Fed CBDC?
A: To leverage private-sector innovation while preserving dollar hegemony, avoiding CBDC disruptions to banks.