Bitcoin Cash (BCH) introduced the CashAddr format starting with version 0.16.2, replacing the legacy Bitcoin-style addresses. This update ensures all RPC commands—like listunspent, listtransactions, and validateaddress—display addresses in the new CashAddr format.
Key Differences Between Legacy and CashAddr Formats
- One-to-One Correspondence: Each CashAddr corresponds to a legacy address, sharing the same private key but differing in representation.
- Interoperability: Funds can be sent between CashAddr and legacy addresses seamlessly.
- Case Insensitivity: CashAddr addresses are case-insensitive (e.g., uppercase or lowercase), though lowercase is preferred.
- Optional Prefix: CashAddr prefixes (e.g.,
bitcoincash:) are optional, while legacy addresses rely on initial characters to denote type. - Encoding: CashAddr uses Base32; legacy addresses use Base58.
- No Fork Required: The transition to CashAddr isn’t a soft or hard fork, though debates persist about its classification.
Why CashAddr Was Introduced
Post-fork, Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin (BTC) diverged significantly. While BTC adopted SegWit and P2SH-SegWit addresses, BCH introduced CashAddr to:
- Prevent User Errors: Distinct formats reduce the risk of sending BCH to BTC addresses (and vice versa), which can complicate fund recovery.
- Enhance Clarity: The new format aims to minimize confusion, though mixed adoption temporarily complicates readability.
Example CashAddr Formats:
- Mainnet:
bitcoincash:qpg6rgmpxr838cnwjhatdyuxkdz644xku54fe5yk99 - Testnet:
bchtest:qqfpw4e90jhanpz2uspe29czwswgk5rd9v3yczymwq
Challenges with CashAddr
- Aesthetics: Critics argue CashAddr’s lowercase, lengthy strings lack the elegance of legacy addresses (e.g.,
18SdNMjLMA9PJLnYr2MJtH8fndwYhq26vP), which used Base58 to avoid ambiguous characters. - Network Identification: Legacy addresses’ prefixes (e.g.,
1for mainnet,m/nfor testnet) made network types instantly recognizable—a feature lost in CashAddr’s version-based system.
Moving Forward
Despite drawbacks, adopting CashAddr is essential to phase out compatibility issues. Developers are encouraged to prioritize broader ecosystem challenges over incremental format tweaks, as prolonged transitions strain resources.
👉 Explore secure BCH tools for address conversion and more.
FAQs
Q1: Can I still use legacy BCH addresses?
A: Yes, but CashAddr is recommended to avoid future compatibility issues.
Q2: How do I convert a legacy address to CashAddr?
A: Use trusted tools like CashAddress Conversion or BTC.com’s converter.
Q3: What happens if I send BCH to a BTC address?
A: Funds may be recoverable by importing the BCH private key into a BTC wallet, but this depends on the recipient’s policies.
Q4: Is CashAddr more secure than legacy addresses?
A: Both formats are equally secure; CashAddr primarily reduces human error in transactions.
Q5: Why does CashAddr look different from legacy addresses?
A: Base32 encoding and a structured format (network prefix + payload) improve error detection but alter visual appeal.
👉 Stay updated on BCH developments with trusted resources.